THE SYMBOLIC ELEMENT IN THE ARCHITECTURE OF THE KIRIFURI RESORT PROJECT IN NIKKO, JAPAN
© Robert Venturi
August 11, 1993; revised January 11, 1995
All architecture includes an element of symbolism in its composition whether it
is admitted or not by its designers. Any architecture no matter how much its
aesthetic employs abstraction or adopts imagery which is new will evoke in its
perception expressions and meanings that derive from reference or association.
These qualities enrich the character of the architecture as a whole. Valid
architecture almost inevitably employs some elements that are conventional,
familiar or historical and that make for implicit or explicit symbolism; even
Modern architecture in its heyday, whose aesthetic was essentially based on an
expression of function and structure, derived some of its meaning from
vocabularies that referred to industrial vernacular architecture of the early
20th century and to advanced structural engineering of the late 19th century.
From these sources a symbolism was derived that was by implication universal in
its meaning.
The architecture of the Kirifuri complex employs symbolism in two ways: first
via spatial and formal elements that are suggestive and abstracted as in the
layout of the wings of the hotel that on the outside suggest a village recessive
in the woods as in the applied trellised elements that, when seen obliquely at
eye-level, suggest the traditional roofs of historical Japanese architecture
and as in the decorative patterns on the end elevations of the village pavilions
that depict fragments of Mondrian compositions and suggest timber frame
construction.
The second way of employing symbolism occurs in the abstracted, decorative
"leaves" applied to the structural frame in the main space of the athletic dome
that suggest a forest in Nikko and in the hotel lobby "Village Street." This
kind of symbolism is more literal and realistic than suggestive or abstracted in
its reference. Also it depicts elements that are not heroic or original but
natural or ordinary. The "ordinary" aesthetic of this manner of symbolism is
based on that of Pop Art where old and familiar elements are depicted via new
media and at a different scale and in a new context: by this means new meaning
is acquired and aesthetic tension is achieved.
The famous genre painting of the Netherlands of the 17th century is another
historical precedent for the symbolism of the everyday in art reflected in the
aesthetic of the open-ended Village Street. R.H. Fuchs writes in his book, Dutch
Painting, of the discovery and glorification of the everyday experience where
juxtaposed elements of ordinary life are made vivid in their depiction in this
form of genre painting at a time when a heroic ideal of aristocratic art was
substituted by a realism illustrating everyday life of middle-class society in
the Dutch Republic. In this book Fuchs discusses the idealization of generic
order over high tradition, of indigenous and vernacular culture as represented in
clutter in the paintings of Pieter de Hooch, Jan Steen, Franz Hals, Jacob van
Ruisdel, and Jan Vermeer. The consequent combinations of realism and symbolism,
of the metaphorical and the representational corresponded to later manifestations
of realist and vernacular content represented in the work of Van Gogh and of his
French predecessors like Manet, Renoir, Cezanne, and others.
And it is relevant to mention distinguished traditions within the history of
Japanese art of prints depicting everyday life in a stylized and aesthetic
manner. So the signs in the lobby as symbolic street of the hotel combine
historic-traditional and contemporary-conventional references that are
essentially familiar. The "street" they line is covered by a glass roof and
terminates at each end with a glass wall so the street appears to extend under
the sky and into nature; there are representations of roof overhangs at its
edges. The symbols work mostly as big-scale, two-dimensional signs either
perpendicular to or parallel with the street. They are often applied to columns.
Where the spaces along the street are enclosed, realistic and colorful
depictions of street elements or street scenes are applied as porcelain-enameled
panels. This material is employed for other depictions of individual elements
and for some perpendicular signs. Dynamic juxtapositions of all these elements
achieve an effect of rich clutter and acknowledge, as the interior "street" meets
the woods outside, another juxtaposition traditional within Japanese architecture
where serene and controlled shrine meets rich and cluttered market.
And these qualities derive as well from joining of cultures what might be
called traditional-craft and contemporary-hype cultures where the village
ethos and the global ethos are juxtaposed, as are high and low cultures and local
and universal cultures in the Japanese urbanism of our time. And these symbolic
and representational elements, combined in the tense manner of Pop Art, can look
both familiar and unfamiliar.
It is extremely important to understand that this explicit inclusion of symbolism
enhances the architecture we are describing by expanding its range and increasing
its dimensions, but that this approach inevitably involves some difficulty and
must be employed with care in this case aesthetic courage must be balanced by
aesthetic care. This complex of buildings cannot suggest by its quality the
questionable sensibility of a Madame Butterfly or a Disneyland. Foreign
architects in this case might see as appropriately exotic what is utterly banal
to local observers; yet foreigners might see new wonders in familiar elements as
they produce art in this era of hype-sensibility and as they celebrate the
vitality in the ordinary and enhance the everyday in this meeting of street and
woods. We are assuming that the degree of sophistication we are working toward
can be achieved through a procedure in the course of design where the architects
consult a Committee representing the client, local architects, historians and/or
anthropologists concerning subject matter and aesthetic manner and involving
these methods of representation, symbolism, stylization, and abstraction. If
this approach is to work it will in the end be sophisticated and naive, serious
and playful adults and children should like it now and over time.
The form and symbolism of the Village Street exploit and celebrate the vitality
and joy characteristic of the Japanese urban scene which is unsurpassed anywhere
in the world. In the end we want to express in this architecture-for-recreation
the ethos of vigor and wit that is a part of Japanese public life today, and at
the same time design the hotel and dome so they are lovable and marketable to the
public.
Is it not interesting that a significant hotel designed at the beginning of
the century in Japan was named the Imperial Hotel but a relevant hotel
designed at the end of the century is to symbolize a village street?
|